Skip to content

Criteria

Internal Medicine

Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) grading of angina pectoris

GradeDescription
IOrdinary physical activity does not cause angina, such as walkingm and climbing stairs. Angina with strenuous or rapid or prolonged exertion at work or recreation.
IISlight limitation of ordinary activity. Walking or climbing stairs rapidly, walking uphill, walking or stair climbing after meals, or in cold, or in wind, or under emotional stress, or only during the few hours after awakening. Walking more than two blocks on the level and climbing more than one flight of ordinary stairs at a normal pace and in normal conditions.
IIIMarked limitation of ordinary physical activity. Walking one or two blocks on the level and climbing one flight of stairs in normal conditions and at normal pace.
IVInability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort, anginal syndrome may be present at rest.

New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification

ClassDescription
INo limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation or shortness of breath.
IISlight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, shortness of breath or chest pain.
IIIMarked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, shortness of breath or chest pain.
IVSymptoms of heart failure at rest. Any physical activity causes further discomfort.

Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale

GradeDescription
0Not troubled with breathlessness except with strenuous exercise
1Troubled by shortness of breath when hurrying on the level or walking up a slight hill
2Walks slower than people of the same age on the level because of breathlessness or has to stop for breath when walking at own pace on the level
3Stops for breath after walking about 100 yards (91 m) or after a few minutes on the level
4Too breathless to leave the house or breathless when dressing or undressing

Oxford Community Stroke Project (OCSP) classification

ClassDescription
Total anterior circulation infarct (TACI)Ischemia in both the deep and superficial territories of the MCA
Partial anterior circulation infarct (PACI)Restricted cortical infarcts due to occlusion of the upper division of the MCA or the lower division
Lacunar infarct (LACI)Small lacunar infarct in the basal ganglia or the pons
Posterior circulation infarct (POCI)Associated with the brainstem, cerebellum, or occipital lobes

Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) classification

  1. Large-artery atherosclerosis
  2. Cardioembolism
  3. Small-vessel occlusion
  4. Stroke of other determined etiology
  5. Stroke of undetermined etiology

Levine (heart murmur) grading scale

GradeDescription
1Only audible on listening carefully for some time.
2Faint but immediately audible on placing the stethoscope on the chest.
3Loud, readily audible but with no thrill.
4Loud with a thrill.
5Loud with a thrill. So loud that it is audible with only the rim of the stethoscope touching the chest.
6Loud with a palpable thrill. Audible with the stethoscope not touching the chest but lifted just off it.

Pitting edema scale

According to Bates’ Guide to Physical Examination and History Taking, 14e

GradeDescription
1+Barely detectable impression when finger is pressed into skin
2+Moderate pitting, indentation subsides rapidly
3+Deep pitting, indentation remains for a short time
4+Very deep pitting, indentation lasts a long time

Medical Research Council (MRC) scale for muscle strength

GradeDescription
0No contraction
1Flicker or trace of contraction
2Full range of active movement, with gravity eliminated
3Active movement against gravity
4Active movement against gravity and resistance
5Normal power

Subdivisions of grade 4 are often necessary. Grade 4-, 4, and 4+ may be used to indicate movement against slight, moderate, and strong resistance, respectively.

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status

GradeDescription
0Fully active; no performance restrictions.
1Strenuous physical activity restricted; fully ambulatory and able to carry out light work.
2Capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about >50% of waking hours.
3Capable of only limited self-care; confined to bed or chair >50% of waking hours.
4Completely disabled; cannot carry out any self-care; totally confined to bed or chair.

Karnofsky performance status (KPS) scale

Definition%Criteria
Able to carry on normal activity and to work. No special care is needed.100Normal; no complaints; no evidence of disease
90Able to carry on normal activity; minor signs or symptoms of disease.
80Normal activity with effort; some signs or symptoms of disease.
Unable to work. Able to live at home, care for most personal needs. A varying amount of assistance is needed.70Cares for self. Unable to carry on normal activity or to do active work.
60Requires occasional assistance, but is able to care for most of his needs.
50Requires considerable assistance and frequent medical care.
Unable to care for self. Requires equivalent of institutional or hospital care. Disease may be progressing rapidly.40Disabled; requires special care and assistance.
30Severely disabled; hospitalisation is indicated although death not imminent.
20Very sick; hospitalisation necessary; active supportive treatment necessary.
10Moribund; fatal processes progressing rapidly.
0Dead.

Murray and Washington's grading system (sputum)

GroupEpithelial cells per low power (×10) fieldWhite cells per low power (×10) field
1≥ 25< 10
2≥ 2510-25
3≥ 25≥ 25
410-25≥ 25
5< 10≥ 25

Los Angeles (LA) grading of esophagitis

GradeDescription
AOne or more mucosal breaks < 5 mm in maximal length
BOne or more mucosal breaks > 5mm, but without continuity across mucosal folds
CMucosal breaks continuous between ≥ 2 mucosal folds but involving less than 75% of the esophageal circumference
DMucosal breaks involving more than 75% of esophageal circumference

Forrest classification of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB)

  • Acute hemorrhage
    • Forrest Ia (spurting hemorrhage)
    • Forrest Ib (oozing hemorrhage)
  • Signs of recent hemorrhage
    • Forrest IIa (non-bleeding visible vessel)
    • Forrest IIb (adherent clot)
    • Forrest IIc (flat pigmented hematin (coffee ground base) on ulcer base)
  • Lesions without active bleeding
    • Forrest III (lesions without signs of recent hemorrhage or fibrin-covered clean ulcer base)

Forrest Ia, Ib, and IIa are high-risk lesions, while Forrest IIb is an intermediate- to high-risk lesion.

Revised Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis

Definition of diagnosis of acute pancreatitis requires two of the following three features:

  1. Abdominal pain consistent with acute pancreatitis (acute onset of a persistent, severe, epigastric pain often radiating to the back)
  2. Serum lipase activity (or amylase activity) at least 3 times greater than the upper limit of normal
  3. Characteristic findings of acute pancreatitis on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and less commonly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or transabdominal ultrasonography
  • If abdominal pain suggests strongly that acute pancreatitis is present, but the serum amylase and/or lipase activity is less than 3 times the upper limit of normal, as may be the case with delayed presentation, imaging will be required to confirm the diagnosis.
  • If the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis is established by abdominal pain and by increases in the serum pancreatic enzyme activities, a CECT is not usually required for diagnosis in the emergency room or on admission to the hospital.

BISAP score for pancreatitis mortality

  • BUN > 25 mg/dL
  • Impaired mental status (any record of disorientation, lethargy somnolence, coma, or stupor)
  • SIRS
  • Age > 60 years
  • Pleural effusion (on chest radiography or CT)

Harris–Benedict equation for basal energy expenditure (BEE/BMR)

  • Men BEE (kcal/day) = 66.473 + (13.7516 × weight in kg) + (5.0033 × height in cm) – (6.755 × age in years)
  • Women BEE (kcal/day) = 655.0955 + (9.5634 × weight in kg) + (1.8496 × height in cm) – (4.6756 × age in years)

CHA2DS2-VA score for stroke risk prediction in atrial fibrillation

ComponentPoints
Chronic heart failure1
Hypertension1
Age 75 years or above2
Diabetes mellitus1
Prior stroke, TIA, or arterial thromboembolism2
Vascular disease1
Age 65-74 years1

HAS-BLED score for 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation

Clinical characteristicPoints
Hypertension1
Abnormal renal and liver function (1 point each)1 or 2
Stroke1
Bleeding1
Labile INRs1
Elderly1
Drugs or alcohol (1 point each)1 or 2

Wells' Criteria for deep-vein thrombosis (DVT)

Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS) for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB)

2023 Duke-International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID) criteria for infective endocarditis (IE)

SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment)-2 score

Modified early warning score (MEWS) in medical admissions

Pediatrics

Tanner staging (Sexual Maturity Rating (SMR)) for boys and girls

  1. Boys - Genitalia Stages
StageDescription
1Pre-adolescent. Testes, scrotum, and penis are of about the same size and proportion as in early childhood.
2The scrotum and testes have enlarged and there is a change in the texture of the scrotal skin. There is also some reddening of the scrotal skin but this cannot be detected on black and white photographs.
3Growth of the penis has occurred, at first mainly in length but with some increase in breadth. There has been further growth of testes and scrotum.
4Penis further enlarged in length and breadth with development of glans. Testes and scrotum further enlarged. There is also further darkening of the scrotal skin, but this is difficult to detect on photographs.
5Genitalia adult in size and shape. No further enlargement takes place after Stage 5 is reached.
  1. Girls - Breast Stages
StageDescription
1Pre-adolescent; elevation of papilla only.
2Breast and bud stage; elevation of breast and papilla as a small mound, enlargement of areola diameter.
3Further enlargement of breast and areola, with no separation of their contours.
4Projection of areola and papilla to form a secondary mound above the level of the breast.
5Mature stage; projection of papilla only, due to recession of the areola to the general contour of the breast.
  1. Boys and Girls - Pubic Hair Stages
StageDescription
1Pre-adolescent. The vellus over the pubes is no further developed than that over the abdominal wall, i.e. no pubic hair.
2Sparse growth of long, slightly pigmented, downy hair, straight or only slightly curled, appearing chiefly at the base of the penis. This stage is difficult to see on photographs, particularly of fair-haired subjects.
3Considerably darker, coarser, and more curled. The hair spreads sparsely over the junction of the pubes. This and subsequent stages were clearly recognizable on the photographs.
4Hair is now adult in type, but the area covered by it is still considerably smaller than in most adults. There is no spread to the medial surface of the thighs.
5Adult in quantity and type, distributed as an inverse triangle of the classically feminine pattern. Spread to the medial surface of the thighs but not up the linea alba or elsewhere above the base of the inverse triangle.

Modified Waterlow and Gómez's classification system for malnutrition

NormalMildModerateSevereNutritional Status
%W/A>90%75–90%60–75%<60%Underweight
%W/H>90%80–90%70–80%<70%Wasting
%H/A>95%90–95%85–90%<85%Stunting
  • %W/A reflects acute/present malnutrition.
  • %H/A reflects chronic/past malnutrition.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s dehydration scale

SymptomMinimal or no dehydration (< 3% loss of body weight)Mild to moderate dehydration (3%–9% loss of body weight)Severe dehydration (> 9% loss of body weight)
Mental statusWell; alertNormal, fatigued or restless, irritableApathetic, lethargic, unconscious
ThirstDrinks normally; might refuse liquidsThirsty, eager to drinkDrinks poorly; unable to drink
Heart rateNormalNormal to increasedTachycardia, with bradycardia in most severe cases
Quality of pulsesNormalNormal to decreasedWeak, thready, or impalpable
BreathingNormalNormal; fastDeep
EyesNormalSlightly sunkenDeeply sunken
TearsPresentDecreasedAbsent
Mouth and tongueMoistDryParched
Skin foldInstant recoilRecoil in <2 secondsRecoil in >2 seconds
Capillary refillNormalProlongedProlonged; minimal
ExtremitiesWarmCoolCold; mottled; cyanotic
Urine outputNormal to decreasedDecreasedMinimal

Downes' clinical croup score

012
Inspiratory breath soundsNormalHarsh with rhonchiDelayed
StridorNoneInspiratoryInspiratory and expiratory
CoughNoneHoarse cryBark
Retractions and flaringNoneFlaring and suprasternal retractionsAs under 1 plus subcostal, intercostal reactions
CyanosisNoneIn airIn 40% O2

Modified Ross heart failure classification for children

ClassDescription
IAsymptomatic
IIMild tachypnea or diaphoresis with feeding in infants, dyspnea on exertion in older children
IIIMarked tachypnea or diaphoresis with feeding in infants, marked dyspnea on exertion, prolonged feeding times with growth failure
IVSymptoms such as tachypnea, retractions, grunting, or diaphoresis at rest

Hanifin and Rajka criteria for atopic dermatitis (AD)

3 or more basic features:

  • Pruritus
  • Typical morphology and distribution:
    • Flexural lichenification or linearity in adults
    • Facial and extensor involvement in infants and children
  • Chronic or chronically-repleasing dermatitis
  • Personal and family history of atopy (asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis)

Plus 3 or more minor features

Apgar score

CategoryScore of 0Score of 1Score of 2
Appearance (skin color)Blue/paleBlue at extremities, pink bodyAll pink
PulseAbsent< 100 bpm≥ 100 bpm
Grimace (reflex irritability)No response to stimulationMinimal response to stimulationPrompt response to stimulation
Activity (muscle tone)AbsentSome extremity flexionSpontaneously flexed arms and legs that resist extension
Respiratory effortAbsentSlow and irregularBreathed and cried lustily

ICD-11 classification

  • Severe: 0-3
  • Mild and moderate: 4-7
  • Normal: > 7

10 warning signs of primary immunodeficiency

Neonatal early-onset sepsis calculator

Phoenix sepsis score

ISSVA classification for vascular anomalies

Wilsons disease scoring system (Leipzig score)

Rochester criteria for febrile infants

Yale observation scale score

OB/GYN

Amsel's criteria for bacterial vaginosis (BV)

Requires at least 3 of the following 4 symptoms or signs:

  • Homogeneous, thin discharge (milklike consistency) that smoothly coats the vaginal walls
  • Clue cells (e.g., vaginal epithelial cells studded with adherent bacteria) on microscopic examination
  • pH of vaginal fluid > 4.5
  • A fishy odor of vaginal discharge before or after addition of 10% KOH (i.e., the whiff test)

Modified World Health Organization (mWHO) 2.0 classification of maternal cardiovascular risk

Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX)

Surgery

American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification system

ClassificationDefinition
IA normal healthy patient
IIA patient with mild systemic disease
IIIA patient with severe systemic disease
IVA patient with severe systemic disease that is a constant threat to life
VA moribund patient who is not expected to survive without the operation
VIA declared brain-dead patient whose organs are being removed for donor purposes

Child-Turcotte-Pugh score for cirrhosis mortality

ParameterCriteriaPoints
Bilirubin (Total)< 2 mg/dL (< 34.2 µmol/L)+1
2–3 mg/dL (34.2–51.3 µmol/L)+2
> 3 mg/dL (> 51.3 µmol/L)+3
Albumin> 3.5 g/dL (> 35 g/L)+1
2.8–3.5 g/dL (28–35 g/L)+2
< 2.8 g/dL (< 28 g/L)+3
INR< 1.7+1
1.7–2.3+2
> 2.3+3
AscitesAbsent+1
Slight+2
Moderate+3
EncephalopathyNo Encephalopathy+1
Grade 1–2+2
Grade 3–4+3
  • Class A: 5-6 points (least severe)
  • Class B: 7-9 points (moderately severe)
  • Class C: 10-15 (most severe)

Milan criteria for liver transplantation

  • Single tumor with diameter ≤ 5 cm
  • Up to 3 tumors each with diameter ≤ 3 cm
  • Extra-hepatic involvement
  • Major vessel involvement

Expanded Makuuchi's criteria for liver resection

Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging classification for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)

Alvarado score for acute appendicitis

FactorScore
SymptomsMigration1
Anorexia-acetone1
Nausea-vomiting1
SignsTenderness in right lower quadrant2
Rebound pain1
Elevation of temperature1
LaboratoryLeukocytosis2
Shift to the left1
Total score10
  • Compatible with the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: 5-6
  • Probable appendicitis: 7-8
  • Very probable appendicitis: 9-10

Appendicitis inflammatory response (AIR) score

VariableFindingScore
Vomiting1
Pain in right inferior fossa1
Rebound tenderness or muscular defenseLight1
Medium2
Strong3
Body temperature≥38.5°C1
Polymorphonuclear leukocytes70–84%1
≥85%2
WBC count10.0–14.9 × 109/L1
≥15.0 × 109/L2
CRP concentration10–49 g/L1
≥50 g/L2
  • Sum 0–4 = Low probability. Outpatient follow-up if unaltered general condition
  • Sum 5–8 = Indeterminate group. In-hospital active observation with rescoring/imaging or diagnostic laparoscopy according to local traditions
  • Sum 9–12 = High probability. Surgical exploration is proposed

Pediatric appendicitis score (PAS)

Diagnostic indicantScore
Cough/percussion tenderness, hopping tenderness2
Anorexia1
Pyrexia1
Nausea/emesis1
Tenderness in right lower quadrant2
Leukocytosis (WBC ≥ 10,000 (109/L))1
Polymorphonuclear neutrophilia1
Migration of pain1
  • Score ≥ 6 is compatible with the diagnosis of appendicitis
  • Score ≥ 7 indicates high probability of appendicitis

Narrow-band imaging International Colorectal Endoscopic (NICE) classification

Type 1Type 2Type 3
ColorSame or lighter than backgroundBrowner relative to background (verify color arises from vessels)Brown to dark brown relative to background; sometimes patchy whiter areas
VesselsNone, or isolated lacy vessels may be present coursing across the lesionBrown vessels surrounding white structuresHas area(s) of disrupted or missing vessels
Surface PatternDark or white spots of uniform size, or homogeneous absence of patternOval, tubular or branched white structures surrounded by brown vesselsAmorphous or absent surface pattern
Most likely pathologyHyperplasticAdenomaDeep submucosal invasive cancer
TreatmentFollow upPolypectomy/EMR/ESDSurgical operation

Caprini score for venous thromboembolism (VTE)

Rutherford classification for acute limb ischemia

CategoryDescription/prognosisFindingsDoppler signals
Sensory lossMuscle weaknessArterialVenous
I. ViableNot immediately threatenedNoneNoneAudibleAudible
II. Threatened
a. MarginallySalvageable if promptly treatedMinimal (toes) or noneNoneInaudibleAudible
b. ImmediatelySalvageable with immediate revascularizationMore than toes, associated with rest painMild, moderateInaudibleAudible
III. IrreversibleMajor tissue loss or permanent nerve damage inevitableProfound, anestheticProfound, paralysis (rigor)InaudibleInaudible

2020 revision of CEAP classification of chronic venous disorders

C classDescriptionE classDescriptionA classDescriptionP classDescription
C0No visible or palpable signs of venous diseaseEpPrimaryAsSuperficialPrReflux
C1Telangiectasias or reticular veinsEsSecondaryAdDeepPoObstruction
C2Varicose veinsEsiSecondary - intravenousApPerforatorPr,oReflux and obstruction
C2rRecurrent varicose veinsEseSecondary - extravenousAnNo venous anatomic location identifiedPnNo pathophysiology identified
C3EdemaEcCongenital
C4Changes in skin and subcutaneous tissue secondary to chronic venous diseaseEnNo cause identified
C4aPigmentation or eczema
C4bLipodermatosclerosis or atrophie blanche
C4cCorona phlebectatica
C5Healed venous ulcer
C6Active venous ulcer
C6rRecurrent active venous ulcer

Each clinical class subcharacterized by a subscript indicating the presence (symptomatic, s) or absence (asymptomatic, a) of symptoms attributable to venous disease

BI-RADS assessment categories and management

CategoryAssessmentManagementLikelihood of Cancer
0Incomplete – Need Additional Imaging Evaluation and/or Prior Mammograms for ComparisonRecall for additional imaging and/or comparison with prior examination(s)N/A
1NegativeRoutine mammography screeningEssentially 0% likelihood of malignancy
2BenignRoutine mammography screeningEssentially 0% likelihood of malignancy
3Probably BenignShort-interval (6-month) follow-up or continued surveillance mammography>0% but ≤2% likelihood of malignancy
4SuspiciousTissue diagnosis>2% but <95% likelihood of malignancy
4ALow suspicion for malignancy>2% to ≤10% likelihood of malignancy
4BModerate suspicion for malignancy>10% to ≤50% likelihood of malignancy
4CHigh suspicion for malignancy>50% to <95% likelihood of malignancy
5Highly Suggestive of MalignancyTissue diagnosis≥95% likelihood of malignancy
6Known Biopsy-Proven MalignancySurgical excision when clinically appropriateN/A

Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS)

CategoryDescription
1Very low (clinically significant cancer is highly unlikely to be present)
2Low (clinically significant cancer is unlikely to be present)
3Intermediate (the presence of clinically significant cancer is equivocal)
4High (clinically significant cancer is likely to be present)
5Very high (clinically significant cancer is highly likely to be present)

Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS)

New grading system for Gleason score

Grade groupGleason scoreDescription
13 + 3 = 6Only individual discrete well-formed glands
23 + 4 = 7Predominantly well-formed glands with lesser component of poorly formed/fused/cribriform glands
34 + 3 = 7Predominantly poorly formed/fused/cribriform glands with lesser component of well-formed glands
48- Only poorly formed/fused/cribriform glands
- Predominantly well-formed glands and lesser component lacking glands
- Predominantly lacking glands and lesser component of well-formed glands
59–10Lack of gland formation (or with necrosis) with or without poorly formed/fused/cribriform glands

2023 Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology

CategoryDescription
INondiagnostic
IIBenign
IIIAtypia of undetermined significance
IVFollicular neoplasm
VSuspicious for malignancy
VIMalignant

Zargar endoscopic classification of caustic injuries

GradeDescription
0Normal mucosa
IEdema and erythema of the mucosa
IIAHemorrhage, erosions, blisters, superficial ulcers
IIBCircumferential lesions
IIIAFocal deep gray or brownish-black ulcers
IIIBExtensive deep gray or brownish-black ulcers
IVPerforation

CT classification of esophageal caustic injuries

Bosniak classification of cystic renal masses

International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)

The new reconstructive ladder

  1. Free flap
  2. Tissue expansion
  3. Distant flaps
  4. Local flaps
  5. Dermal matrices
  6. Skin graft
  7. Negative pressure wound therapy
  8. Closure by secondary intention
  9. Primary closure

American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) organ injury scale

  • Spleen, liver, kidney
  • Renal trauma
  • Pancreatic trauma

Modified Bell´s staging criteria for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC)

Todani classification of bile duct (choledocal) cysts

National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) criteria for cervical spine radiography

  • Neurological deficit
  • Spinal tenderness (midline)
  • Altered mental status
  • Intoxication
  • Distracting Injury

Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score

Revised ICG–HNPCC criteria (Amsterdam criteria II)

There should be at least 3 relatives with an HNPCC-associated cancer (colorectal cancer, cancer of the endometrium, small bowel, ureter, or renal pelvis)

  • One should be a first-degree relative of the other 2
  • At least 2 successive generations should be affected
  • At least 1 should be diagnosed before age 50
  • Familial adenomatous polyposis should be excluded in the CRC case(s) if any
  • Tumors should be verified by pathological examination